- Laos moving forward in establishing guidelines for responsible agricultural investment
- Lao National Assembly and Land Information Working Group organize Workshop on Land and Natural Resource management
- Regional perspectives on paralegal models for land conflict resolution in Myanmar
- Three students from Mekong Region get scholarships for a new masters course in Land Governance in Chiang Mai
|September 25, 2017||September 26, 2017||September 27, 2017||September 28, 2017||September 29, 2017||September 30, 2017||October 1, 2017|
|October 2, 2017||October 3, 2017||October 4, 2017||October 5, 2017||October 6, 2017||October 7, 2017||October 8, 2017|
|October 9, 2017||October 10, 2017||October 11, 2017||October 12, 2017||October 13, 2017||October 14, 2017||October 15, 2017|
|October 16, 2017||October 17, 2017||October 18, 2017||October 19, 2017||October 20, 2017||October 21, 2017||October 22, 2017|
|October 23, 2017||October 24, 2017||October 25, 2017||October 26, 2017||October 27, 2017||October 28, 2017||October 29, 2017|
|October 30, 2017||October 31, 2017||November 1, 2017||November 2, 2017||November 3, 2017||November 4, 2017||November 5, 2017|
Regional perspectives on paralegal models for land conflict resolution in Myanmar
They’ve been dubbed “barefoot advocates”; paralegals in Myanmar are now forging a path for local communities when it comes to land conflict resolution.
Global legal advocacy movement Namati has been using the paralegal approach in its work in Myanmar for the past five years, teaching community members with no prior legal training how to use the legal process when negotiating government processes around land rights.
Representatives of civil society networks from Cambodia, Laos and Vietnam had an opportunity to see this process first hand during an annual CS network exchange hosted by Land Core Group (LCG), a Myanmar-based network that works to raise awareness of land issues and promote policy reform to support small-scale farmers.
This CS network exchange, held in September in Ngwe Saung, was an opportunity for CSO groups to gain a greater understanding of the paralegal model and its potential to solve land conflicts through field visits and meetings in two villages.
Namati, LCG and their partner the Green Peasant Institute, have together developed the Ayeyarwaddy Paralegal and Advocacy Project, using the Mekong Region Land Governance project’s Innovation Fund.
The visitors to the villages in the Kyaungkone Township came away inspired by the motivation, commitment and self-confidence of the paralegal representatives, especially those who are women.
Their continuing efforts to support farmers in resolving land disputes demonstrated a larger need for local and community-based organisations in Myanmar to find ways to move forward.
Until now, the legal framework for land governance in the country is far from being able to resolve land conflicts and improve land tenure for farmers.
The low capacity of the new government and the rush to obtain land titles is accentuating the land conflicts, and paralegals are being swamped with new cases. A recurring example in Myanmar involves farmers and fishermen, and their mutual dependence on water supplies from irrigation channels.
But with both parties relying on different regulations from separate ministries – the Irrigation Department of the Ministry of Agriculture and the Fishing Department, respectively – there are many gaps and contradictions in existing laws that inhibit easy solutions.
Another frequent topic is the land confiscated in 1989 by the government when farmers couldn’t fulfill the required quota of rice production. This land has since been given to companies or to other tenants, and the new government has stated that the land needs to be returned to the farmers, appointing “land return committees” to take charge. Farmers are now trying to retrieve their land by writing to the authorities and bringing the land return committees onto the field. However, they are not getting responses.
It is clear that paralegal officers have a growing burden to contend with, and are also grappling with the question of how to continue once MRLG’s project’s funding ends. In the meantime, participants in this study trip were able to agree that a follow-up process by LCG and Namati, collecting case studies and evidence, would be vital in lobbying the government to adjust its land laws.